In crypto, a fork happens when people decide to change how a blockchain works. The protocol – the set of rules the network follows – gets updated.
Sometimes, everyone agrees on the update and moves forward. Other times, part of the network sticks with the old version. That’s when a fork creates two different paths. If not everyone agrees on the change, the blockchain can split into two.
Forks are how blockchains adapt. They’re used to add new features, fix bugs, improve performance, or respond to disagreements. Without them, crypto networks wouldn’t be able to evolve.
But forks can also cause problems. They can split communities, create duplicate coins, and cause price swings. It’s important to understand the changes that a fork can bring about, especially if you’re holding tokens on a network that might fork.
What is a Fork in Blockchain?
Blockchains only work when everyone agrees on the same version of the ledger. This shared history is what keeps the network secure. A fork is what happens when that agreement breaks.
It starts when some nodes (the computers that run the blockchain) switch to a new version of the rules, while others don’t. From that point, the blockchain splits in two.
If the change is backward compatible, it’s called a soft fork. Everyone can still use the same chain, even if some don’t upgrade.
If the change isn’t compatible, it’s a hard fork. That creates a separate chain with its own rules. Both versions continue, but they’re no longer connected.
What are the Reasons for Forking?
Blockchains don’t stay the same forever. Sometimes they need upgrades. Other times, people just can’t agree on how things should work. That’s when a fork becomes the way forward. Here are the top reasons for forking.
Protocol Upgrades
This is one of the most common reasons. Developers may want to improve the network by adding new features or adjusting how it works. These changes often aim to make the system more useful or efficient. If everyone agrees, it’s usually a smooth upgrade. If not, it can split the chain.
Security Enhancements
If there’s a bug or vulnerability in the code, a fork might be needed to fix it. Security-related forks are often urgent and meant to protect the network. The faster the fix rolls out, the safer the system becomes.
Scalability Solutions
As blockchains grow, they can get slower and more expensive to use. Some forks are meant to solve this by increasing transaction speed or reducing fees. These updates help the network handle more users without breaking down.
Community Disagreements
People in crypto often have different ideas about how things should work. Developers, miners, and users don’t always agree. And when those disagreements get serious and no one backs down, the result is often a fork that splits the project in two.
Types of Forks
We’ve already mentioned that forks fall into two main categories: hard forks and soft forks. The difference comes down to whether the update requires everyone on the network to change their software. Some updates force a split. Others keep the chain intact.
What is a Hard Fork?
A hard fork changes the rules in a way that older versions can’t follow. To stay on the new chain, everyone needs to update.
If some don’t, the chain splits and both versions continue separately. The two chains resulting from a hard fork will each run on their own version of the rules, and often, each chain will have its own token.
Hard forks usually create a new blockchain, require full network upgrades, and give users duplicate coins on both chains. These types of forks often come from big disagreements or major upgrades that can’t be done gradually.
Here are a couple of hard fork examples that you’ve probably heard of before:
- Bitcoin Cash (BCH): Bitcoin Cash (BCH) was created in August 2017 as a result of a long-standing dispute within the Bitcoin community over how to scale the network. One group advocated for increasing the block size to allow more transactions per block and reduce fees, while the other favored keeping the block size smaller and implementing off-chain solutions like the Lightning Network. When consensus couldn’t be reached, a hard fork occurred, and Bitcoin Cash was launched with an increased block size limit (initially 8MB), aiming to support more on-chain transactions and preserve Bitcoin’s original use as peer-to-peer electronic cash.
- Ethereum Classic (ETC): Ethereum Classic (ETC) was created in 2016 after a major disagreement within the Ethereum community following the hack of The DAO, a decentralized investment fund built on Ethereum. Hackers exploited a vulnerability and stole about $60 million worth of Ether. To recover the stolen funds, most of the Ethereum community supported a controversial hard fork that rewrote the blockchain’s history. However, a minority opposed altering the immutable ledger on principle and continued using the original chain, which became known as Ethereum Classic
What is a Soft Fork?
A soft fork is a more subtle change. It updates the blockchain without breaking compatibility with older software. This means even if some nodes don’t upgrade, they can still interact with the network. Everyone stays on the same chain.
Soft forks are mostly used for small improvements like adding new features or making the system more efficient. They’re backward-compatible, don’t require everyone to upgrade right away, and avoid splitting the chain.
Here are some known examples of soft forks:
- Segregated Witness (SegWit): SegWit was introduced in 2017 as a Bitcoin protocol upgrade to address scalability and transaction malleability issues. The idea was to separate (or “segregate”) the witness data—digital signatures—from transaction data, effectively increasing block capacity without raising the actual block size. SegWit was proposed as a compromise between those wanting larger blocks and those preferring more conservative upgrades. It was activated after gaining enough miner support and paved the way for technologies like the Lightning Network.
- Taproot: Taproot was activated in November 2021 as a major Bitcoin upgrade aimed at enhancing privacy, efficiency, and smart contract capabilities. It was the result of years of development following the implementation of SegWit in 2017. Taproot combined several proposals—most notably Schnorr signatures and MAST (Merkelized Abstract Syntax Trees)—to make complex transactions indistinguishable from simple ones, improving privacy and reducing transaction size. The upgrade gained broad consensus in the community and was activated through a soft fork using the “Speedy Trial” signaling method.
What Effect Do Forks Have on The Crypto Community?
Forks have a ripple effect from the developers writing the updates, to the miners keeping the network running, and the investors holding the tokens. When a fork happens, everyone has to decide how to respond.
Developers
For developers, forks are a chance to build. They can use a fork to introduce new features, fix problems, or take the network in a different direction. But it’s not always smooth, and reaching consensus can be hard.
If the community is split, developers might have to choose which side to support or maintain both chains. That takes time, money, and coordination. Forks can also slow things down if people stop trusting the process or argue over what comes next.
Miners
Miners have a big role in forks, especially in proof-of-work systems. After a hard fork, they have to pick which chain to mine. Their decision affects which network is more secure and stable.
It also affects their bottom line. Some forks change the mining algorithm or reward system, which can make certain equipment useless or less profitable. When miners are split, both chains can become more vulnerable, at least for a while.
Investors and Users
For investors, forks can be risky but also profitable. In a hard fork, you often end up with coins on both chains. That sounds like free money, but it also comes with uncertainty. Prices can swing fast as traders try to guess which version will survive. Some investors dump one coin and hold the other. Others sell both. If a fork isn’t widely supported, the new coin may crash in value or fade away.
There are also security risks. Forks can open the door to replay attacks, where a transaction on one chain is copied on the other. To prevent replay attacks, developers often implement replay protection – technical measures that make transactions valid only on one chain. This might include using different address formats or adding unique chain identifiers to each transaction.
Forks and Community Dynamics
Every fork starts with a disagreement. Since blockchains are decentralized, there’s no single entity in charge, which is beneficial for transparency, but also makes it easy for conflicts to lead to a split.
Sometimes, forks are smooth. The community discusses a change, reaches consensus, and moves forward together. Other times, it gets more complicated. Different groups push different agendas, and when no one backs down, the chain splits. That’s how you end up with two projects, two coins, and a divided user base.
Forks highlight how important governance is in crypto. Without strong communication and some level of coordination, even good ideas can lead to chaos. Projects with clear upgrade paths and engaged communities tend to handle forks better. The ones without that often lose momentum, users, or both.
At the end of the day, forks are a feature of open networks. They give people a way to act when they disagree, instead of being stuck with decisions they don’t support. That freedom is what makes crypto powerful and complicated.
Crypto Fork FAQs
What is a crypto fork?
How does a hard fork differ from a soft fork?
Why do blockchain networks implement forks?
What happens to my cryptocurrency holdings during a fork?
Can a fork lead to the creation of a new cryptocurrency?
How do I know which chain to support after a fork?
Are forks common in all blockchain networks?
What are the risks associated with participating in a forked blockchain?
How do forks impact the value of a cryptocurrency?
Where can I find information about upcoming or past forks?
References
- University of Oxford: An Overview of Forks and Coordination in Blockchain Development
- Ethereum.org: The History of Ethereum