Fault in LP Setup Results in $331,000 Profit for Art Coin

Updated: 10 May 2023

Disclosure

Don’t invest unless prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, you shouldn’t expect to be protected if something goes wrong.

Join Our Telegram channel to stay up to date on breaking news coverage

In an unusual turn of events, a user could earn a staggering $331,000 in seconds because of a flaw in setting up a liquidity provider (LP) on Uniswap V3.

This fortunate individual had initially invested only 0.1 ETH in the Art Coin presale, a platform that focuses on art for artists, and could exchange their ART token for ETH on Uniswap V3. The LP on Uniswap V3 had a vulnerability in its configuration that allowed the user to take advantage of the exchange rate in their favor, resulting in a massive profit.

While such incidents are rare, it highlights the importance of thorough testing and security measures on decentralized finance platforms. A user recently identified a flaw in Uniswap V3’s presale process and quickly took advantage of it by selling their pre sale allocation for 181 ETH, worth over $331,000, on May 7th. Before this, the same user had purchased 0.01 ETH of ART during the presale.

While some have raised concerns about the legality of the dump, likening it to a rug pull, the consensus is that the responsibility for the exploit lies with the project’s developers and not the user who identified and exploited the flaw. Therefore, the user is “lucky” rather than at fault for the situation.

Art Coin’s Liquidity Pool Exploit Highlights Complexities of Uniswap V3

The Art Coin founders have released a statement explaining that the recent exploit of their project’s liquidity pool was caused by miscommunication. They had intended to have two developers help them set up the LP and understand its workings before distributing tokens. However, a misunderstanding led them to set up the LP before token distribution, which resulted in bots rapidly draining the funds when the first batch of tokens was sent out.

This incident highlights the complexities of Uniswap V3, the latest version of the decentralized exchange, which introduces a feature called “full liquidity.” This allows liquidity providers (LPs) to provide liquidity within a specific price range, which might increase their rewards. However, this also requires deploying projects to customize their parameters carefully to prevent traders from taking advantage and exiting at above-market rates.

This is what happened.

1) Two devs were going to help us understand LP and set it up.

There was miscommunication and we set up the LP before distributing tokens.

So when we sent out the first batch bots went crazy and drained it.

— $ART (@artethcoin) May 7, 2023

In Art Coin’s case, a user could exit at higher market rates, effectively draining the project’s funds. With 181 ETH lost from the presale funds, the project now only has 40 ETH remaining and is planning to conduct a new fundraising round. This incident serves as a cautionary tale for other projects seeking liquidity from the community and highlights the importance of thoroughly understanding and implementing the features of Uniswap V3.

Challenges Faced by UniSwap and Other Exchanges

Uniswap V3 has introduced new features, such as full liquidity, which have been adopted by other decentralized finance (DeFi) projects like PancakeSwap and SushiSwap. However, these features come with complexities, especially in liquidity provision, which can be challenging for inexperienced developers who may not fully understand how the version operates. Additionally, the transparency and immutability of on-chain transactions mean that any weaknesses that are exploited can cause significant costs, especially if the pool is drained.

Considering this, Art Coin developers have continued supplying liquidity with lower amounts and are considering another presale. They will only receive funds if the trader reconsiders and refunds the project’s developer. It’s important for DeFi projects to understand the features and risks associated with different versions of decentralized exchanges before adopting them to avoid potential issues and losses.