{"id":424162,"date":"2023-07-28T11:40:31","date_gmt":"2023-07-28T11:40:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/insidebitcoins.com\/?p=424162"},"modified":"2024-06-04T08:30:51","modified_gmt":"2024-06-04T08:30:51","slug":"stablecoins-pose-lower-risks-than-bank-deposits-new-policy-paper-argues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/insidebitcoins.com\/news\/stablecoins-pose-lower-risks-than-bank-deposits-new-policy-paper-argues","title":{"rendered":"Stablecoins Pose Lower Risks Than Bank Deposits, New Policy Paper Argues"},"content":{"rendered":"

A recently published policy paper has spotlighted stablecoins and their potential risks to the financial system.<\/p>\n

Stablecoins: Not Your Typical Bank Deposits, Says Paradigm’s Policy Paper<\/b><\/h2>\n

Authored by former Federal Reserve Board analyst Brendan Malone for tech investment firm Paradigm, the paper<\/a> contends that equating stablecoins with traditional bank deposits is too simplistic due to their unique attributes.<\/p>\n

Stablecoins, cryptocurrencies pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, differ notably from bank deposits in their avoidance of “maturity transformation”—where banks use short-term deposits for long-term loans, thereby creating constant risk management demands.<\/p>\n

\"Stablecoins\"<\/p>\n

The recent Silicon Valley Bank collapse exemplifies the dangers of maturity transformation, as a discrepancy between long-term client deposits and immediate withdrawal demands led to financial instability and regulatory intervention.<\/p>\n

Conversely, the study points out that stablecoins, particularly those tethered to fiat currencies, generally exhibit fewer risks due to their reserve assets typically being backed by short-dated Treasuries and kept separate from the issuer’s other assets.<\/p>\n

These features, along with potential federal regulation, could prevent the duration mismatches seen in traditional banking.<\/p>\n

Stablecoin holders also have the ability to redeem at par on demand, further reducing maturity transformation risks.<\/p>\n

Unique Features of Stablecoins and Regulatory Considerations<\/b><\/h2>\n

The policy paper clarifies the distinct roles of stablecoins and money market funds, with the former used mainly for pegged-value transactions and the latter as investment or cash management tools.<\/p>\n

Unlike money market funds, large dollar-pegged stablecoins offer no return on reserves, acting as a digital cash equivalent instead.<\/p>\n

The paper suggests a nuanced regulatory approach to manage stablecoin issuers, warning that strict bank-like regulation could stifle competition and create market monopolies.<\/p>\n

It proposes measures specifically addressing stablecoin risks while fostering innovation.<\/p>\n

Balanced stablecoin legislation can bolster confidence in these digital currencies and prevent power concentration among market players.<\/p>\n

The paper’s release coincides with a wave of digital asset bills presented to the U.S. Congress since 2022, including the Stablecoin TRUST Act and the Stablecoin Innovation and Protection Act, aimed at regulating stablecoins.<\/p>\n

Crypto expert commentary on stablecoin stability further validates the paper’s assertions.<\/p>\n

\n

Since we are all discussing Stablecoin bills again, I wanted to come back around and give my thoughts on this in public, hopefully in a mildly more concise version.<\/p>\n

From a first principles perspective, a stablecoin that is actually going to fulfill the promise of being stable is…<\/p>\n

— Austin Campbell (@CampbellJAustin) July 25, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n